Choice of software development technologies based on pareto-optimal solutions https://doi.org/10.33108/visnyk_tntu2019.03.116

Article Sidebar

Vol. 95 No. 3 (2019)
Download article PDF
Published: 31-10-2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33108/visnyk_tntu2019.03.116
Keywords:
software development technologies, Pareto set, pareto-optimal choice, alternative

Main Article Content

Igor Kovalenko
Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine
Alyona Shved
Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine
Yevhen Davydenko
Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine

Abstract

The choice of the software development technology based on the methods of multicriteria
selection is considered in the paper. Technologies of software life cycle are analyzed. Alternatives and evaluation
criteria for software development technologies are formed. The methodology of forming Pareto set with the
subsequent Pareto-optimal choice on it is proposed. The considered procedure for identifying the relative
importance of the criteria makes it possible to narrow down Pareto set and, reelatively, to reduce the number of
possible solutions. The numerical example of the proposed methodology for applying Pareto set construction is
given. As a result, the procedure for identifying the relative importance of the criteria made it possible to narrow
down Pareto set and hence reduce the number of possible solutions up to two alternatives.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 95 No. 3 (2019)

Section

Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

1. Savenko I. I. Tehnologiya razrabotki programmnogo obespecheniya. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta, 2014. 67 p. [Іn Russian].

2. Yakunin Yu. Yu. Tehnologii razrabotki programmnogo obespecheniya. Krasnoyarsk: IPK SFU, 2008. 225 p. [Іn Russian].

3. Fisun M. T., Davydenko Ye. O. Reinzhyniryng programnogo zabezpechennya modulya generatsii keruyuchih program v SAPR DEYMOS. Sbornik nauchnyih trudov SWorld. Vol. 12. No. 4. 2013. Р. 30–34. [Іn Ukrainian].

4. Mayorova E. S., Oshurkov V. A., Tsuprik L. S. Sovremennoe sostoyanie sredstv razrabotki mobilnyih prilozheniy na platformah IOS, Android and Windows Phone , Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya. Vol. 16. No. 4. 2015. Р. 83–87. [Іn Russian].

5. Dyachenko R. A., Mahammad M. D. Prinyatie resheniy pri vyibore instrumentalnyih sredstv razrabotki avtomatizirovannyih sistem. Izd-vo SpbGPU. No. 1. 2009. Р. 105–106. [Іn Russian].

6. Klimenko I. V. Metod vyibora instrumentalnogo sredstva dlya razrabotki programmnogo obespecheniya, Izv. Vuzov. Tehnich. nauki. No. 4. 2011. Р. 6–9. [Іn Russian].

7. Pavlenko E. P., Ayvazov V. A., Beryuh I. S. Vyibor tehnologii razrabotki programmnogo obespecheniya informatsionnyih sistem. ScienceRise. Vol. 2. No. 5. 2015. Р. 40–43. [Іn Russian].

8. Kovalenko I., Davydenko Ye., Shved A. Development of the procedure for integrated application of scenario prediction methods. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 2019. Vol. 2. Issue 4 (98). P. 31–38. DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2019.163871. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.163871

9. Kovalenko I. I., Davydenko Ye. O. Pareto-optymalnyi vybir pry formuvanni portfelya zamovlen IT- proektiv. Scientific works: scientific and methodological journal. Computer Technology. Vol. 173. No. 161. 2011. Р. 44–48. [Іn Ukrainian].

10. Nogin V. D. Prinyatie resheniy pri mnogih kriteriyah. SPb.: YuTAS, 2007. 104 р. [Іn Russian].

11. Dzyuba E. A., Shibanov S. V., Gerasina A. I. Sravnitelnyiy analiz sovremennyih sredstv podderzhki zhiznennogo tsikla informatsionnyih sistem. Trudy mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma «Nadezhnost i kachestvo 2012». Penza, 2012. Vol. 1. Р. 420–427. [Іn Russian].

12. Chernyahovskaya L. R. Intellektualnaya podderzhka prinyatiya resheniy v organizatsionnom upravlenii razrabotkoy programmnyih proektov. Vestnik UGATU. Vol. 58. No. 5. 2013. Р. 195–199. [Іn Russian].